Cognitivism as a Learning Theory

       The statement by Kerr in the blog from January 2007 summarizes the learning theory debate nicely.  He states that each theory is contributing something useful to an overall picture.  None of the strategies is complete in and of themselves (Kerr, 2007).  The debates and arguments over which theory should be employed in education fail to look at the overall picture.  Behaviorism cannot be abandoned as an instructional method.  It has its place in the learning environment.  Children and adults respond to reward systems, and they can be used successfully in fostering a positive attitude toward learning. 

       As I read through the dialogs referenced, Kerr seems to suggest the concepts function in a pyramid design.  Behaviorism is particularly useful in for memory type learning with lower level cognitive requirements.  The structure exemplifies cognitivism when the learning level advances to procedural learning.  Problem solving involving collaboration and creativity call for constructivism.  Each learner progresses through these learning stages for different learning concepts.  To attempt problem solving and collaboration without a proper foundation is problematic.  A teacher should use all the learning theories when developing a curriculum unit.

       Kapp introduces an intriguing idea into the learning theory discussion- the link between humanity and machines.  As we program computers to complete routine human tasks, we are creating a learning machine. They can make the rote memorization of material a pointless task.  Why should students memorize history facts when a simple Google search will provide sufficient information?  Is the availability of base level information on a computer sufficient?

       I believe that memorization and behaviorist rewards should not be the core strategy for a learning environment.  They have their place in a complete learning program, however.  It is not reasonable to begin the learning process at the higher-level learning platform.  A foundation of knowledge provides the schema needed to foster cognition and subsequently constructivism. 

       Please refer to the original blog postings for background information and a review on these topics.

Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html

Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/